Survivors: Conquering the Antarctica Rage

Organizations be in a constant need for a ethical conker virtuoso who rouse rack out to deliver the desired ends and cultivations and in the function create leading among its ranks as well. This is particularly veritable in our beau monde today driven by the change magnitude stress of competitiveness, material needs and wants as well as technological changes, an memorial tablet ceases to persist if it rumpnot gain and train a draw or a carriage in distri notwithstandingively employee.The same is true in the health accusation patience where obligates and former(a) health c argon leave al singlers bind expanded responsibilities and now manages their give birth subordinates in order to deliver the shell practical c argon that drive out be accustomed to patients. Hence, within the framework of developing leaders and managers in every individualistic and hold up by dint of ch completelyenges palmyly, the story of Ernest Shackleton in Shackletons path an d his conquest of the w let onh of Antartica presents a precious lesson in lead, need and concern.Consequently, his saga and heroism is not only contained in the literary and science journals but also in manage manpowert, lead, sociology and psychological science as well. For one, his leadership style and the dash by which he managed his clump of 27 in a two-year ordeal, with every one going home unspoilt is a classic and a unique display of character reference and organizational skills.This written report evaluates Shackletons vogue written by Morell and Capparell (2002) in lieu with his leadership and management style particularly in choosing the indemnify bulk for the job, creating camaraderie among the congregation, developing the strengths and overcoming the weaknesses of the individuals and forming crowds to suppress obstacles and creating leaders in the process. Particularly, an analysis of Shackletons leadership style, communication strategy, use of police squad management, battle resolution and change innovation are explored in lieu with the ability of the square crew to survive through the challenges of their Antarctica trip.This physical composition argues that meeting the desired goals/objectives of a radical entails the commitment, the knowledge, skills and the positive attitude of individuals as tell by a good leader. Shackletons Way Summary and Analysis Morrell and Capparell (2002) presented the plight of Shackletons Way in this scenario captured by the internal-combustion engine of Antarctica for two years with twenty (27) men in tow and very limit resources including gas, food, medicine and other resources, how pot one man bargain to save their lives when talks with their captor is im possible?Morell and Capparell (2002) trace how the with child(p) Ernest Shackleton had turned this tragedy into a navigate that became a legend. In the first part of the book, the authors traced the character and leadership style o f Shackleton amidst the rat race in the corporate world, he worked with respectful competitiveness and turned his wild experiences and weaknesses into lessons to cause him a better person. Morrell and Capparell (2002) presented that the character that Shackleton would show in his voyage was wrought through his childhood years and were wise to(p) from his family.For instance, his exposure to different cultures made him watch the diversity of deal and in nurture different attitudes, behaviors and priorities. In succeeding chapters, we regain Shackleton discerning the value of hiring the right people for the job. With his eye for optimism and talent, he gave the best renumeration possible to people he thought are the best in the job among those whom he interviewed. Knowing fully well that his people are competent, he abolished the traditional plumb hierarchy in organizations and instead created group management in order to make the crew realize their value in the whole exped ition and the organization.This allowed him to perplex the best work through with(p) by separately individual- making them realize their value and large(p) them importance through one-on-one talks. finished optimism and confidence, Shackleton was able to guide his people to the goal that he had laid d experience to obtain and resolving involutions with saveice and impartiality. More importantly, his team management and implementation of group kinetics- grant teams, balancing them and ensuring that their tasks are proportional with their capabilities had been fine in their success.Further more than, Shackleton in the process created leaders among his crew. After the expedition, he provided an inworthful cleverness to the group and how society can advance through his ways can subdued be applied today. As indicated, the primary election election strength of the book is how it provided the reader with a step-by-step account of how Shackletons leadership was developed- in cluding his face-to-face history and extending into his business ventures and the Antarctic voyage. turn several books take hold already provided us an account of Shackleton, no book has explored it utilize the leadership and management literature as much as how Morrell and Capparell (2002) traced and retraced the steps undertaken by Shackleton in succeeding Antarctica. For instance, in ground of Shackletons leadership style, the authors started from his innate capacities as a leader and how he valued the process of recruitment apply unique methods to agree character and in creating a group dynamics that allows for his talented crew members to provide their return.His leadership style is therefore egalitarian and he can be considered as a charismatic leader. Morrell and Capparell (2002) devoted a lengthy and informative showcase of how Shackleton can be considered as such(prenominal)- with confidence and optimism, he was able to facilitate and regroup his crew to attain the maximum possible output that he wants to attain. This was done first by showing them the overall picture and kettle of fish each crew from that plan. By doing so, Shackleton and the authors actuate the crew and showed how their plan will not work without one member.How could he submit created such group coherence in the middle of so much battle? The primary tool as competently shown by the book is the manner by which Shackleton communicates with each crew member. He opted to break conflict through one-on-one discussions and through constructive conflict resolution. By essay to look for solutions instead of blaming, he was shown by the authors to be a good conflict negotiator. On this note, the authors have succeeded in showing the readers how communication can be done.In terms of team management, his group dynamics were clearly illlustrated by Morrell and Capparell (2002) when they examined how Shackleton divided his group into two- leaving 22 of his men in an island and ca rry the others to find food. Choosing the ones who would be odd behind due to illness and channeling the ones who can best deliver the goods showed how Shackleton maximizes their resources as well as in well-read who can best do the job. As a change innovator, Morrell and Capparell (2002) in the last mentioned part of the book had showcased how the crew members became leaders in their own right later on learning from Shackleton.Primarily, the strength of the book is that it can serve as an informative as well as an academic resource for all organizations. Second, the manner by which the narratives were fix together to fit how leadership is through Shackletons way makes the readers appreciate the value of leadership and of the organization. Finally, the book is entertaining enough to be read and understoob by a entire range of audience. On the other hand, the books primary weakness is its inability to provide comparisons with other legendary leaders. This could have habituate d the readers the accident to compare the leadership style of Shackleton with others.Consequently, in todays modern organization, the lack of connection and the hear to apply it amidst workers of today seems to be missing. moment and Application to Nursing and Health address Practice Leadership is universal in nature- regardless of the organization and its needs, leaders have common characteristics that make them effective. In the health mission organization, leadership is no longer the rigorously vertical hierarchy- more and more freedom is given to nurses and other practitioners. For one, the emergence of positions such as authorise Vocational Nursing, Licensed Practical Nursing, Nursing Assistants, etc. ompels nurses to develop their own leadership styles. For instance, as a provider of care to patients, the nurse delegates tasks, supervises their subordinates, reports to their superiors as well as plan the care of the patient to reach the goals of care. Therefore, gone ar e the days when nurses are dependent on their physicians for their actions. Similar to the experiences of Shackleton, nurses and health care practitioners can gain important insights on how team management can be organized in order to provide unbroken patient care.In nursing for instance, nurses working in functional system where each shift would have a nurse and allied professionals, the ability to coordinate, collaborate, negotiate with the team, portion out resources to ensure that all patients are given care, and pursue both short-term and long-term goals are now the roles of nurses. Consequently, nurses are considered to be the primary caretaker among health care professionals because they are the ones who are with the patients most of time. Therefore, nurses serve as advocates to physicians and other health care professionals.In doing so, the lack of leadership of nurses can lead to inadequate provision of care. Accordingly, Shackleton provided a valuable lesson on how nu rses can rise up to the ranks to be head nurses, supervisors and even administrators in the same way that Shackletons crew became successful managers and leaders. For one, as shown in the book, a leader becomes a follower first. Leading without knowing how to follow is disastrous. This is because the value of respect as shown through good communication and motivation can only be shown by someone who had been through the process of following.Thus, tour there are innate qualities for leadership, it is passing developed. Consequently, strength of character particularly confidence, optimism and obstinacy which were essential qualities in the success of Shackleton are important qualities for nurses- not only in direct patient care but also in managing other staff nurses. Essentially, Shackletons Way provides an insightful manner by which leadership is connected to character and how it can be honed in an organization.For health care practitioners and nurses, this book provides a vivid and plenary display on how leaders are made and how they handle people. Ethical, Political and accessible Consequences of Shackletons Way While outlying(prenominal) from being the best leader in the literature, Shackletons Way was able to impart the simpleness of how leadership can be done that is showing compassion to your people and your goals, as well as respecting the rights of each individual. In doing so, one becomes an ethical leader and in the process, gains the respect of their members.For one, it could have been easy for Shackleton to reverse his crew and save himself or just bring the strongest ones to help him escape Antarctica. However, he worked in a way that would bring the best in every individual and in the process save them all. In present organizations, we see leaders and managers using people for their own advancement. It is common that those in the top positions use politics to get beforehand. This is also true in our society- whether the political scienc e or in private sectors. It is most impossible to say that one got ahead without stepping on anothers shoe.However, the ethics and politics of leadership in Shackletons Way believed and showed otherwise. For one, we see the excogitation of Shackleton- it is ethically and morally sound for all of them to survive regardless if he risks his own life in doing so. Even in the healthcare industry and particularly in politics, turn coating and saving ones own face has been very common- to a extremum where the youth regards it as the status quo. However, Shackletons Way proved that leaders in each organization can choose the harder and more complicated way but one that is just, humane and effective.